gmrhodes13

If you go by the CRL it does show the the ammo strip lower, albeit I would have let it through as is BUT every GML is different

Nice work Caleb, should be a walk in the park, good luck with approval.

Great work on the updates Jason. I agree with the thighs, looking at a lot of the references last week you can definitely see it depends on size as to how wide/open the thighs are but one thing which is constant is the position on the thigh and calf align to the outside of the lower ridges. 2 thigh straps have been pretty common place, amazed it hadn't come up before, all comes down to references. In regards to the CRL's I believe all the RO base costumes should have the same details across all of them, apart from the obvious things that we know are different. No doubt that conversation will come up once we are ready for the new CRL or have time to revisit the RO CRL for updated.

"Looking better" ie looks good, leave it as is

That would up to the DO's, I will tag them and hopefully you will get a reply soon @Deployment Officer Team

I would check with your GML (garrison membership liaison) they look after base legion level approval, FISD only deal with L2 and L3 applications. For me they are a tad thick in some places. Could also cleanup/straighten lines around the ears. In saying that as a GML I would pass as is.

Looking better. Exciting times ahead

Congratulations Caleb and welcome to the club, a full list of previous winners can be found here

Imperial Boots, they open for ordering at beginning at the month https://www.imperialboots.com/

Not something that's really come up very often, all depends on the makers sculp, movie armor was not perfectly symmetrical. A couple of references, which do look a little off sided to me

Although I may have validated what was seen in TROS the question would still be what was consistently seen in TLJ and TROS, in many of the multiple trooper or main trooper images the most common blaster is the TLJ version, produced specifically for TLJ and carried over to TROS. I can agree not an issue for basic approval but for higher levels these items should be added. Now I haven't been through how often a version is seen as I've already spent way too much time on this. With that I would like to see the following TLJ specific items discussed/polled and added to the CRL at a time convenient to all of course, perhaps after incoming elections. Thanks to Chris for collating the list, added a couple of things also. D ring mount painted white (already added) Rectangular D ring white (already added) No cocking lever (L3) Cocking lever channel has swapped sides, now on right (same side as Hengstler) (L3) End cap full cut out on top front edge, not just a recess. (L3) Additional holes on top of front barrel at front and rear ~11mm diameter (L2) Picatinny rail and mount bracket on front barrel right side approx. half way down. (already added L3) "Dipped" ring into rear barrel just behind Hengstler removed. (L2) End cap clip squared off at end cap end. (L3) Edit: front sight is painted black not silver Rear sight rounded not angled I'll review the list again tomorrow to seeing if I've missed anything

Just to sum up the main differences of F-11's per my research in this thread, as it's easy to pick what is what just by one or two details which are specific to each version. So there are 4 main versions of F-11's, we know the TLJ blaster had some significant upgrades from the TFA but there was also a TROS Promo version, it's a TFA with a TLJ picatinny rail added, although further forward than the standard TLJ but also there is a TFA with no picatinny rail. Differences between the TROS and TROS Promo/Stunt can be found here 1: TFA production image - 2 versions below, with D ring and without 2: TLJ Production image - 2 extra holes top of barrel, cocking slot opposite side, different end cap, different end cap release, different rear sight now rounded not angular like TFA and added picatinny rail TLJ pre filming - mainly new TLJ but a few TFA note you can tell this by the black D rings and silver mounts 3: TROS Promo - STD TFA with a picatinny rail added but further forward than TLJ 4: TROS - STD TFA with no picatinny rail (also seen with NO D ring version) F-11's seen in TROS STD TLJ - TROS with these 3 troopers (with all the TLJ bells and whistles) STD TFA - Speaking FOTK's No picatinny rails STD TFA - Guarding Chewie STD TFA no D ring STD TFA with TLJ update - TROS promo standees (picatinny rail further forward) STD TFA with TLJ update - TROS picatinny rail What I believe Ardeshir is aiming for in his TLJ EIB second version application would be what I call the "TROS Promo" version (STD TFA with a TLJ upgrade) like the TROS promo image. Previously posed in his TLJ EIB app Recently updated with picatinny rail now further forward FYI Ardeshir was approved with a TLJ CRL version (STD TFA with picatinny rail) from his first TLJ Centurion Application Then changed it to silver mount black D ring and moved the picatinny rail