penpen Posted February 24, 2009 Report Share Posted February 24, 2009 (edited) so i got my armor back in oct and still havent built the bucket, and at my local garrison someone said that its not a fx since the chin is part of the helmet and is smaller then an fx Edited February 7, 2021 by gmrhodes13 photos updated gmrhodes13 2021 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bobby fletcher Posted February 24, 2009 Report Share Posted February 24, 2009 That's an FX bro. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
penpen Posted February 24, 2009 Author Report Share Posted February 24, 2009 damn Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TK 6918[501st] Posted February 25, 2009 Report Share Posted February 25, 2009 a recasted fx I might add Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TK-4510[TK] Posted February 25, 2009 Report Share Posted February 25, 2009 Man, I never seen an FX recast. Yeeeoch!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TK 6918[501st] Posted February 25, 2009 Report Share Posted February 25, 2009 Man, I never seen an FX recast. Yeeeoch!! It happens when you don't do your homework I guess PenPen: if you want to stick with that bucket, don't worry there's plenty of us who will help you out Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
penpen Posted March 8, 2009 Author Report Share Posted March 8, 2009 (edited) i only paid $100 bucks for the armor from a buddys dad (sat for 10yrs) so its not a huge deal, the armor looks good for a fx recast then (old style thighs) and i still wanna get a MRce Edited February 7, 2021 by gmrhodes13 photos updated gmrhodes13 2021 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TK-4510[TK] Posted March 8, 2009 Report Share Posted March 8, 2009 $100!!! Thats a pretty sweet deal! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TK-1287 Posted March 8, 2009 Report Share Posted March 8, 2009 Yeah, that's definitely an FX. Only difference is that the vocoder has been cast directly onto the faceplate. That's obviously an FX helmet, I don't know what the guy you were talking about was thinking when he said it was not. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
penpen Posted March 8, 2009 Author Report Share Posted March 8, 2009 (edited) yeah $100 was a steal but it was alot of work, ill say im 80-90% done--------- Edited February 7, 2021 by gmrhodes13 link not working, removed gmrhodes13 2021 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Daetrin[Admin] Posted March 8, 2009 Report Share Posted March 8, 2009 Those older style thighs are the shizz. Heck, I've paid $65 or so alone just for them. It's a great first set - you can make it look good, no worries. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
penpen Posted March 8, 2009 Author Report Share Posted March 8, 2009 old style thighs are the ones without the rectangular cut out on the bottom of the back right? or am i wrong on that too lol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TK-1287 Posted March 8, 2009 Report Share Posted March 8, 2009 Nope, you're correct. I have a pair of old style thighs, no cut out. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Daetrin[Admin] Posted March 8, 2009 Report Share Posted March 8, 2009 old style thighs are the ones without the rectangular cut out on the bottom of the back right? or am i wrong on that too lol Yes, no block cut out on the back. they are also narrower and more contoured in appearance and tapered at the bottom. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kiyotei[TK] Posted March 8, 2009 Report Share Posted March 8, 2009 A tip on identifying AP and TE2 helmets vs FX is that both AP and TE2 helmets are 3 piece kits where as FX is 5 pieces: AP: 1. face plate 2. Cap-back are one piece 3. ears FX 1. face plate 2. top cap 3. back 4. ears 5. vocoder FYI RTMod come assembled so you cannot get a raw kit. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
penpen Posted March 8, 2009 Author Report Share Posted March 8, 2009 Yes, no block cut out on the back. they are also narrower and more contoured in appearance and tapered at the bottom. damn so thats why they are so tight, might have to trade a skinny legged person for some new style ones then, but mine are a bit messed up and cant find anywhere that sells just thighs bah! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TK-7980 Posted May 28, 2009 Report Share Posted May 28, 2009 If I end up going with a new FX kit rather than something else, I'd be happy to trade for your old style thighs! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.