-
Posts
14,622 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
180
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Gallery
Articles
Everything posted by ukswrath
-
Right!? lol
-
Looking good Joby. I had the same issue with my first mannequins, found myself loping off digits to make things easier to install and take off lol
-
THT . Keep up the great work
-
Nice work Jeff. If you're concerned about the difference in alignment between the ears you can always use this technique, align the upper and lower ear screws with the rear line of the front traps. Edit: Btw it doesn't have to be exact.
-
TK-91452 Requesting ROTJ Centurion Status [378]
ukswrath replied to Spada Rossa's topic in Request Centurion Status
Alright Joe let's get you approved. Thank you for your Centurion application. CRL and Centurion Application Requirements: All required submission photos are present. As mentioned during your EIB application beautiful job on your build. Andrew and I would like to welcome you to Centurion. Great job and ongratulations Other-Armor Fit/Assembly: Time to get out there and represent the Empire as its newest ROTJ Centurion -
TK-91452 Requesting ROTJ Centurion Status [378]
ukswrath replied to Spada Rossa's topic in Request Centurion Status
Awesome thank you -
FN1313 Anovos FOTK Build Thread
ukswrath replied to FN1313's topic in Build Threads Requireing Maintenance
-
Welcome to the wonderful world of Anovos shins. Hot water bath is probably your best bet if you're going to be using hook and strap method. Mics behinds the brow was my first design, still like idea.
-
Is AM/FX armor still good for 501st approval?
ukswrath replied to Nativtexan's topic in Hard Armor (General Discussion)
Hey Chris you're on FB also correct? Yea there are several helmet manufacturers to choose from. Have you looked at our vendor list? https://www.whitearmor.net/forum/topic/11538-the-various-types-of-armor-and-where-to-find-them/ -
Is AM/FX armor still good for 501st approval?
ukswrath replied to Nativtexan's topic in Hard Armor (General Discussion)
The FX policy has been changed. It (the entire armor) is not accepted at Centurion. If you were in the build process at the time it was changed then it will be grand fathered in, but that would have been many moons ago. -
Nice work. I may have missed this earlier but did you originally intend to use brackets or are the screws for cosmetic reason?
-
TK-91452 Requesting ROTJ Centurion Status [378]
ukswrath replied to Spada Rossa's topic in Request Centurion Status
That is correct -
Since Anovos has been making changes we'll have to see the helmet first to determine. If you want to post photos we'd be happy to take a look.
-
TK-91452 Requesting ROTJ Centurion Status [378]
ukswrath replied to Spada Rossa's topic in Request Centurion Status
Hey Joe Andrew or myself will be with you shortly. Before we get started we're asking you to take another look at the forearms, wrist side. It appears there some return edge material where there should be none. Please remove any return edge material then post another photo of this area. Thank you -
Yep, even though we pretty much have it figured out nowadays
-
Hey Jeff I've never worked with Walt's armor before so I'm only commenting here to maybe shed some light. We have several Centurions with WTF armor, some with shin assemblies like what I believe Paul is trying to convey and the other two like yours. Here are the links. After the links I posted a couple ROTJ shin reference photos. Though I believe Paul has a valid point what Walt has told you about his armor is, well, it's his armor so who am I to argue. You'll have to be the judge of what is what, this is your armor. Hope this helps https://www.whitearmor.net/forum/topic/43897-tk-38987-requesting-centurian-status-anh-stunt-wtf-372/ https://www.whitearmor.net/forum/topic/43656-tk-19233-requesting-anh-stunt-centurion-status-wtf-367/ https://www.whitearmor.net/forum/topic/43371-tk-33729-requesting-centurion-status-anh-stunt-wtf-359/ https://www.whitearmor.net/forum/topic/40912-tk-11731-requesting-anh-stunt-centurion-status-wtf-313/ https://www.whitearmor.net/forum/topic/39526-tk-12864-requesting-anh-stunt-centurion-status-wtf-288/
-
Looks great Dana, great job.
-
YOU CAN DO IT!
-
BTW nice onesie
-
For level two certification (if applicable): Folding stock (does not need to function). A real or replica ammo counter - based off of a Hengstler counter - shall be present. D-ring mounted on the rear. Sterling based blasters have the correct M-38 or M-19 style scope. Two power cylinders on the magazine housing. Scratch-built or cast blasters shall have a total of 6 T-tracks on blaster (leaving the lowest row on the magazine housing side uncovered). If using the Hasbro E11 toy blaster, it is modified to have the correct number of T-tracks (6 total), with a lower row of open vent holes on the magazine housing side. This is accomplished by covering the pre-existing rows of holes with T-tracks, then grinding off the lower integrated T-track on the magazine housing side, and drilling a new row of holes in its place. No ESB/ROTJ greeblies are allowed on the blaster. For level three certification (if applicable): Hasbro blasters are not allowed, even conversions.
-
Sorry for the delay, thanks for picking up the slack Brien
-
Anytime Devin THT
-
Very cool Jim
-
Thanks for the demo Dana. With this armor being so thin its nearly impossible to avoid deformities of any magnitude when attaching a foreign object to its surface be it inside or out. Compared to your earlier versions what we're seeing now is far better reinforcing the fact that whatever you changed in your process snap type or other has appeared to have resolved the issue.