Daetrin[Admin] Posted January 29, 2007 Report Posted January 29, 2007 FYI I posted some new group tags to reflect the split of 501st folks into two groups: 501st non-TK, and 501st-TK (e.g. detachment members) MEMBERS Members Member (Supporter) 501st MEMBERS * 501st Member 501st Member (Supporter) DETACHMENT MEMBERS ** 501st Trooper 501st Trooper (Supporter) The 501st TK list is still being reviewed against our membership database and a bulk migration of qualified members will happen within the next week or so. * 501st but not a TK ** 501st and a TK Quote
Daetrin[Admin] Posted February 7, 2007 Author Report Posted February 7, 2007 The groups have been reviewed and these boards updated. Please review your status: if you are a detachment member (501st *AND* a TK) you should see the detachment member's only area, and be labeled as a 501st Trooper instead of a 510st Member. Quote
Butah Fett Posted February 7, 2007 Report Posted February 7, 2007 Mine doesn't adequately embody me. Can you get it to say "super awesome?" Quote
Daetrin[Admin] Posted February 7, 2007 Author Report Posted February 7, 2007 Sure. Check your new title. Quote
Butah Fett Posted February 7, 2007 Report Posted February 7, 2007 Sweet! Best detachment leader ever! Quote
Exodus[TK] Posted February 7, 2007 Report Posted February 7, 2007 Anyone watch SouthPark... SUPER!!! (in the correct character voice) Quote
TK8280 Posted February 7, 2007 Report Posted February 7, 2007 Sweet! Best detachment leader ever! Aw...can you get mine to say (Pimp Master "B") Quote
Exodus[TK] Posted February 7, 2007 Report Posted February 7, 2007 Technically speaking our S@A shouldn't have a custom name. Standard process is keep the naming convention associated to member status and rank based on postings. Quote
Butah Fett Posted February 7, 2007 Report Posted February 7, 2007 Technically speaking our S@A shouldn't have a custom name. Standard process is keep the naming convention associated to member status and rank based on postings. That's 100% correct, hence my suprise that he actually did it. This was something that was discussed amongst the command staff and we found that keeping standard naming conventions would be the best and fairest way to go. If that means giving up my name, I'll... I'll let it go. Quote
TK-2126_MD[TK] Posted February 7, 2007 Report Posted February 7, 2007 Mine doesn't adequately embody me. Can you get it to say "super awesome?" Dont forget "HUMBLE" Just teasing no need to blast me. Quote
TK8280 Posted February 8, 2007 Report Posted February 8, 2007 That's 100% correct, hence my suprise that he actually did it. This was something that was discussed amongst the command staff and we found that keeping standard naming conventions would be the best and fairest way to go. If that means giving up my name, I'll... I'll let it go. I was just joke'n about the nick name Quote
Daetrin[Admin] Posted February 8, 2007 Author Report Posted February 8, 2007 There are rules, and there are rules. Actually the Legion charter only states that there needs to be a detachment leader. I may summarily dispose of my staff should I feel I not need one, or have a dozen lackeys with super cool fancy titles if I want. Each det & DL has a lot of leeway in this matter. But as Ed says, we do try to standardize as best we can to avoid confusion. Quote
TK-2126_MD[TK] Posted February 8, 2007 Report Posted February 8, 2007 or have a dozen lackeys with super cool fancy titles if I want. I know i am taking the thread down the wrong exist but.... I like the term Minions Quote
beerman667[501st] Posted February 8, 2007 Report Posted February 8, 2007 As much as I like my "Member" can I get switched to Trooper? heres a link to my page: http://www.501st.com/members/displaymember...amp;userID=7180 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.