Winning a case such as this (although I see it more as a near miss than a win), doesn't give him ownership rights of the brand. Even if he'd sculpted these himself, he wouldn't necessarily have rights to reproduce, especially as conceptually he doesn't own them nor did any of the sculptors to my knowledge. They were paid to carry out works. Normally there are contracts in place to protect such loop holes but I believe so early on, in a rushed production on a shoe string, this is purely why AA is able to get away with what he has.
As a software developer, I'm basically owned by the company and any intellectual property belongs to them, no matter what I come up with, while I work under their roof they own all code. This also means that legally I can't produce similar products myself without all sorts of legal issues cropping up.