ireachy

Alice pack will be the next build component following the Antenna build which I will be posting up tonight. Will be interested to see if your antenna cable ideas tally with our investigations and multiple build trials :-)

Hi ScouseTrooper, BackStage Props may make one in the future although this is not confirmed. If it anything like their shoretrooper helmet and armour, or their Hover Tank Trooper helmet then it would be an amazing set of kit. Aside from BSP I am unaware of any real serious efforts to replicate the R1 TK armour at this time. Mr paul will likely know more. Best, ireachy

Yes, and we have spent a lot of time at looking at getting the correct wrap, lay and threading of the cable, as per the CE prop. We will detail that in the next part of the thread.

Antenna Whilst there has been much time and effort, and discussion, focused on the identification and sourcing of the K-Type dinghy quick release hook greeblie found part, the back pack antenna is currently the part that is proving the most enigmatic. The team has jumped to this part of the CE pack as we are conscious that folks are making their antennae and we feel that we are now in a position to reveal what we believe is the found part. This will hopefully assist pack builders in sourcing the correct antenna part and avoid unnecessary purchases and time spent making close enough parts more accurate. This section will be in two parts: Part 1 is intended to highlight our investigations to identify the found part for the antenna used on Rogue One Jedha large back pack. Part 2 will detail the building of the antenna, including the tubing and the end cap. As with other sections of this thread, the team’s observations are based upon details associated with the Rogue One Stormtrooper (R1 TK) back pack as seen on display at Celebration Europe 2016 (CE) in London. Antenna – Part 1: Found Part Identification and Reveal We will present an examination of the antenna prop whilst comparing it with what the team now believes is the found part. We will focus on diagnostic features seen from the CE reference material. Originally there was a hypothesis that the antenna is an altered / modded military radio antenna, as used on jeeps, Land Rovers etc., ‘Telefunken model Ms 116/117/118’. Discussions also looked at the possibility that the antenna is a fishing rod. The ‘eyes’ / guides that the tubing on the antenna is threaded through were rapidly agreed to be fishing rod line guides (hereafter referred to as ‘eyes’). The team has discounted the use of a military radio antenna as the prop. This is based on the diagnostic features listed below, and also relates to the relative rarity of these parts and their prices; most examples fetching prices in excess of £50 and up to £100+. This did not seem to be the type of part that is used by Star Wars prop builders, for what will effectively be background props. As we know from experience such items in the OT were built from cheap items such as seed trays, plumbing parts, Tupperware and wet wipe tubs e.g. the sandtrooper packs I in Episode IV. The prices did not stack-up for us. Detailed review of the available reference pics has convinced the team that a fishing rod was used for the prop – a common and generally cheap part to source for prop building. The reference material shows several distinct diagnostic features that we have used to identify what we believe is the found part. These diagnostic features are: 1. Texture of the antenna; 2. Details of the cut end; 3. Antenna outer diameter; 4. Details of the eyes and their spacing – this also relates to antenna length; and 5. Eye whipping / ‘wraps’ and the red ‘flash’. Texture The CE prop antenna has a distinctive texture that appears to be a type of black carbon fibre wrap. The carbon fibre has a rippled texture running around the antenna and is evident on a lot of modern fishing rods. This observation is based on referencing online pictures and also personal observations made by team members looking at rods in angling and outdoor recreation shops. The pictures below show the CE prop and then the found part. Open (Lower) End of the Antenna There are several reference shots of the CE prop that show the bottom end of the antenna. From the reference material the antenna appears to be hollow with a grey colour associated with the end. When the found part fishing rod is cut it gives the same appearance as the CE prop. Antenna Outer Diameter We have taken guestimate measurements from the CE antenna. These have been determined using the known width of the webbing used on the canvas roll as reference. The webbing is standard 25 mm / 1”. A marker line was drawn on a reference pic and then transferred to the cut end of the antenna. The outer diameter (OD) of the cut end is approximately one-third the width of the webbing i.e. 7-9 mm as judged using the reference pic. This was the OD range we were initially looking for. It should be noted that the reference materials make it hard to be specific as the lighting at the CE display is problematical and no clear flash photography could be found of this part. Measurement of the found part shows that the OD at the cut end is 9 mm, so within the range we were hoping for from the picture calculations. Mr paul also compared the found part with life-size zoomed reference pics to determine if we had a match. Again, the width of the webbing was used to establish a baseline scale so that the image was not biased by the width of the found part. The measurements of the found part matches-up with the CE prop. Details of the Eyes, Spacing and Antenna Length The eyes on the found part and the CE prop are distinctive. They are new style eyes used for guiding the fishing line from the spool along the length of the rod. On the CE prop they are used to retain the tubing that runs along, and wraps around, the length of the antenna. It should be noted that the eyes on the CE prop have been manipulated to accommodate the tubing and this will be covered in Part 2 when we discuss building the antenna. The distance between the eyes / whippings was also measured from reference pics using the known webbing width of 25 mm / 1”. From the top of the first eye’s whipping to the bottom of the second eye’s webbing is approximately 10.5 times the width of the canvas roll webbing. This gives a distance of approximately 262.5 mm (10.5 * 25 mm = 262.5 mm). The same distance measured on the found part equals 257 mm. So the rough calculated distance is reasonably close to the measured distance on the found rod. Certainly close enough and within the likely margins of error associated with the rough visualisation. Eye Whippings and the Red ‘Flash’ Reference material from CE clearly show areas where the eyes are attached to the antenna. On fishing rods these are known as whippings and traditionally involved wrappings of line securing the base of the eye. On the CE prop these whippings appear as raised areas securing the eyes to the antenna. What is most notable is that in places at the base of each whipping there is a distinctive red flash / wrap that ‘pops’ in many of the photographs of the CE prop. The found part rod also has this most distinctive diagnostic feature. Using the deduction, observations and investigations presented above, and having the fishing rod in the hand, we are confident that mr paul, with assistance from the team, has correctly identified the CE pack antenna found part as the: Avanti Precision 12ft 3 piece float rod. The rod is currently available from Sports Direct in the UK and in the United States: http://www.sportsdirect.com/avanti-precision-x-12ft-float-rod-942037?colcode=94203703 http://us.sportsdirect.com/avanti-precision-x-12ft-float-rod-942037?colcode=94203703 And is running at a 50% discount indicating that this may be limited stock. These rods are only available online – they are not stocked in any Sports Direct store – the team has asked. Part 2 detailing the antenna build including sourcing the tubing and antenna end cap will be presented shortly. ireachy

Working on the roll ID at the moment - but it is a bugger to pin down!

swpropmaker, Thanks, glad that you like the thread. We'll be touching on all the points you have raised. I am imminently about to post up about the antenna. Just finalising the drafting now. We are confident that we have discovered the found part for the antenna, so I suggest you resist the urge to buy random fishing rods etc. for next couple of days atleast. We were going to move onto the shoulder straps after the antenna, but have decided to publish our observations about the Alice pack itself next. SlyFox740 has just posted some details about the Alice pack webbing on the R1 back pack found parts threads. We've made the same observations and would like to piggy-back and look at the Alice pack webbing and threading details, as we've spent hours working out the details on these pieces. Keep a look out as the antenna found part reveal will be up shortly, and will also appear on the Parts of Star Wars site and also The RPF. Best, ireachy

Hi, As mr paul replied, we know that the female hook was used to attach to D-rings - based on a sample still attached to a D-ring. It may be plausible that as the RAF and RN moved over to the PSP kit stored in a GRP box, and away from the canvas Type A MK.II and MK.II and Type B packs, that the D-ring was riveted to the box. The female hook would then clip onto the GRP PSP box. This is something that we are chasing with the Imperial War Museum here in the UK. We'll let you know if get an answer. Best, ireachy

Bonus Section As a nod to the release of some awesome R1 posters and the latest trailer last week, the team thought that we should cut across the build thread and divulge what we have found out about the metal hook greeblie used on the left shoulder strap of the pack. Our observations will again relate to the CE prop. However we do know that this greeblie is present on all packs seen in trailers, the sizzle reel, and promo pics, along with the Hot Toy. It should be noted that certain insights have also been provided to the team by Andy Rodgers of DA Props and Face Book forum ‘The Shed of Glittering Delights’. As stated, in keeping with the rest of the build thread, the observations presented here are based primarily on the back pack seen, and photographed, at Celebration Europe 2016 (CE). The various trailers and the sizzle reel indicate that the hook greeblie is present on all of the Jedha large back packs seen to date, although shots from these sources are not detailed enough to contribute to any detailed analyses of the greeblie itself. Towards the end of August / beginning of September 2016, the hook greeblie was discussed / identified (as far as possible) on various forums including: ‘The Parts of Star Wars’ site ‘The Shed of Glittering Delights’ Facebook group, and on ‘FISD / whitearmor.net’. The hook greeblie is believed to be a quick release connector associated with RAF and RN 1940s onwards K-Type pilot dinghy pack. Three similar quick release units were used on each dinghy pack, to attach the pack storing the uninflated emergency single person life raft (dinghy) to the pilot / observer harness rig, or to ejection seats 1950s onwards. The K-Type dinghy was used in fighter aircraft or by observers in those RAF aircraft where the large multiple crew round dinghy was not practical. During the Second World War the K-Type dinghy pack was intended to be used by fighter pilots and observers wearing the seat type parachute, replacing the normal parachute seat cushion. They were thus referred to as the ‘seat pack’ as the pilot actually sat on the dinghy pack whilst in the aircraft. The team believes that one of the quick release clips attached to the 1941 pattern life jacket, and a similar quick release (not associated with K-Type pack) was also associated with the parachute activation handle seen on the waist belt (near 12 in image above). The Type A pack contained the dinghy and equipment with a readily detachable top panel connected to the dinghy by a painter, and to the pilot by a webbing strap. That webbing strap was attached via a quick release unit. Various types of K-Type dinghy pack are known with Type A, MK.II. used up to around 1942-44, and MK. III.s used 1944 onwards. The MK.III.s and Type Bs had additional features such as extra pockets for extra CO2 inflators and different arrangements of storage pockets etc. The quick release unit used for the K-Type dinghy pack consists of two components: · A male component consisting of the quick release mechanism at one end and a T-bar for attaching to straps on the K-type dinghy pack; and · A female T-bar component. The quick release unit used for the CE hook greeblie also consists of two components: · A male component consisting of the quick release mechanism and a T-bar for attaching to straps on the K type dinghy pack; and · A female spring-loaded hook component. It is important to note that the team has NOT been able to locate ANY reference pictures showing the female hook component attached to K-Type dinghy packs or RAF / RN pilot / observer harnesses. However, the use of the ‘seat packs’ continued with RAF early jet aircraft (1950s), although the dinghy pack evolved into the Aircrew Personal Survival Pack (PSP) container over time which housed everything for pilot survival, including the dinghy in a Glass Reinforced Plastic (GRP) box, but still under-slung on the harness. It is possible that the female hook component came into use once the PSP and GRP box became the standard, allowing a more efficient quick release system attaching to clips on the GRP box? The team is currently approaching the Imperial War Museum, Duxford, to see if they are able to further identify the female hook component of the CE hook greeblie. Component Details As stated, the quick release unit used for the greeblie consists of two components: male quick release unit + female hook component. Male Quick Release Component The male component of the quick release unit appears ubiquitous across many 1940s+ RAF and RN flight gear. It is known to have been used on the K-Type dinghy pack, along with 1941 pattern seat parachutes. The male component has no readily identifiable maker’s mark, but most samples do have either a Patent Number on them: Pat No. 478506, or the following ID No. 27C/2157. This is located around the top collar of the corrugated quick release pull mechanism near the T-bar end. The team has so far been unable to further identify the male component, although it does appear a ubiquitous 1940s-1960s RAF / RN quick release mechanism. Female Hook Component The female hook component does have a maker’s mark and part number: AML 115. Research by lonepigeon and mr paul indicates that AML refers to the maker: Aircraft Materials Limited. AML is now part of Airborne Systems, which still makes very similar equipment, although no longer produces the actual female hook component used for the greeblie (as far as we can ascertain, and certainly not in the 1940s-50s form). Review of the team’s collective sample of quick release units has revealed both subtle, and more distinctive, variations between various female hooks. Most notably, some male quick release and female hook components appear to be cast in a silver finish metal whilst others are cast in a metal with a ‘gold’ finish. The female hook is cast metal with the maker’s mark consisting of a cast alphanumeric on one side of the hook stem – AML115. In general the ‘5’ is exceedingly indistinct, although some samples do show this character, most often the silver metal versions which appear to retain a sharper moulding than the ‘gold’ hooks. On the reverse side of the stem a V can discerned. However, some hooks also have the maker’s mark and part number stamped onto the outside neck of the hook. The stamp is AML115, so it appears that these hooks just have a more clear presentation of the information we already know concerning the maker – AML – and the part number – 115. Following the mark AML115 on the neck there is also a stamp mark. This is a circle containing a stylised AML over the numeric 51. The team has not been able to identify the significance of the numeric 51, however this could be a year stamp e.g. 1951, with those hooks not displaying this feature being manufactured prior to 1951? However, this is conjecture, we do not presently know, and this is one of the questions being asked at the Imperial War Museum. From the photographic material available of the CE prop greeblie it is impossible to determine if the maker’s stamp and part number are present on the neck of the one used on the CE pack. There is another, slightly different female hook available. This has the same version of toothed hook jaw and spring mechanism as the previous types described. However the main hook stem and body has some noticeable variations. These are: 1. Appears cast in a different metal type, it is less ‘granular’ with an almost machined finish; 2. The ‘step ’between the stem (which attaches to the male quick release component) and the ‘hook’ is much less rounded, more angular then on the other hooks; 3. AML 115 is very clearly and cleanly stamped onto the face of the hook; 4. There is a maker’s mark stamped above the AML 115 mark; and 5. There are two parallel lines running around the stem of the hook. Whilst prominent, it is difficult to discern what the circular stamp mark actually contains, although the numeric 1 is clearly visible at centre bottom. The first and last letter may be L. The team is unsure about the second and third characters. This will require some more analysis. Conclusions Further analysis is required to see if there are any maker’s stamp details or part number mark on the outside neck of the CE prop greeblie. Analyses of trailer and sizzle reef footage have not been able to provide any answers, and the film footage is also unlikely to provide the required resolution of detail. Only close-up, detailed photographs of actual screen used prop packs are likely to provide any further information. Regardless, the CE prop has been identified as best as possible, and the male quick release and AML115 female hook are the found parts used on the CE prop, and presumably the other Jedha large back pack props used in the film. The team has exerted much time, effort, and funds to try and track down a supply of the CE hook greeblie. The fact that the found part originates in the UK, as with many Star Wars found parts from the OT, means that we have been exhaustive in our efforts. This has led to contact with a supplier with known previous contact with, and supply to, films such as: Prometheus, Spectre, and The Martian. Mr paul and ht7 were recently able to visit the supplier in person, and on the back of the visit the team were able to purchase the supply of the AML115 hook and male quick release units that the supplier held. The team's vision is to secure the only known supply, and limited numbers of, the found part and enable sales to prop builders, film aficionados etc. ireachy

Yes - we will mention the Hot Toys Jedha TK with large pack. There are a few points that are off as with all the HTs, but the figure does look awesome, and we may refer to it if necessary. But one of the most intriguing points is that aside from FN2187, we have a second OT era TK with a number - TK421, and now TK14057. Will our orange pauldron TK get a named / numbered mention in the film? More interesting, there is a 501st member with that designation.

Thanks Alexander, can't wait to see your upgraded version 2 pack as your version 1 was one of the first ones out there

SlyFox740, thanks for your observations. Any comments or critiques are most welcome as we want this thread to be the best reference possible for the CE pack. I agree that you have identified a variation on your M75 compared to our samples. As you have shown, the webbing angle mount is NOT definitively welded in-line with the frame (contrary to what we stated regarding the M75), but some - yours, and presumably others - are welded at the outside of the frame in a similar manner to the LK35. So that is good to know. The weld position may now NOT be a definitive identification of an LK35 or M75. Thanks. But as you have subsequently stated in discussion with mr paul, the angle that the webbing mount meets the frame does appear to be a diagnostic, with the M75 meeting at more of an angle, and the LK35 being more perpendicular to the frame. Regarding your observation about the angle brace placement. This is a very useful observation, and is an identification point. Mr paul's M75 is the same as yours, and my LK35 has exactly the same placement of angle brace as per the picture above for the LK35. Again, thanks. This thread is not a dictatorial 'done case' / fait accompli, and by publishing on the forum we are hoping to stimulate discussion and further investigations to hopefully corroborate, or refute, our identification of parts - wait until we get to the canvas roll :-). At the end of the process we should hopefully have a reference that can be pinned and act as a definitive build thread. At least we are still on the correct track regarding the positive identification of the frame as being the M75 :-) Best, ireachy

Sorry Bryan, that these are proving a pain to buy. Have you thought about buying from EM, and then putting your LC-2 frame and pack together and selling on Fleabay. It is ridiculous that the woodland camo straps cost the same, if not more than LC-1 large pack with LC-2 frame! I'll keep feelers out for you, but these are looking more difficult to acquire than the K-Type dinghy quick release greeblie!! Best, ireachy

sylverbard, it would be great if this 'real world' military knowledge was adopted 'in-universe'. I imagine it is just an oversight / consistency error, but the truth may out when we see the final cut of the film, and get to see if these inconsistencies were ironed out in pick-ups / edits. Regardless, I love your application of military knowledge. This pack just feels more military than the other TK / TD back packs - but that is just my feeling.

Thanks UKSwrath, this is a real team effort, and the observations are a collective collaboration from mr paul, lonepigeon, and ht7. I'm just the one who can wax lyrical. Hope you enjoy the thread and follow us to the end. We think there are some real unique insights that we hope will enable folks to complete some great authentic builds. Myself, I mostly just enjoy the investigation and digging down to the detail of found parts, and how it comes together in the build as a whole to look exactly like the prop. I could hardly be a DO for MEPD as my TK armour is only about 90% complete at the moment, and is an FX suit (I can here the gasps - lol) - although I am pimping it to meet 501st standards for submission. But I do know this pack :-) Best wishes, ireachy

1. The Frame This first build section of the thread will look at the FRAME used on the Rogue One Stormtrooper (R1 TK) back pack as seen on display at Celebration Europe 2016 (CE) in London. There has been a lot discussion about the frame since the weekend of CE, and alongside the Ammo Box, it was one of the first parts to be identified. It was rapidly posited that the frame belonged to a 40/45 (or even a 70 litre) Swedish back pack with frame model number LK35 or M75: https://www.facebook.com/PartsofSW/photos/a.936085596514055.1073741860.193037424152213/957124981076783/?type=3&theater Haglofs made a civilian version of the LK75 until the late 1990's, with early models having cotton webbing straps, and later version with nylon ones (Lars E Grimstad, on PoSW). However, clear pictures of the CE back pack frame, especially detailed ones are very difficult to find. Primarily due to the fact that it is obscured by the trooper and the rest of the actual TK pack itself. However as seen in the pictures above, the frame is mounted outside of the attachments. The frame is not within the Alice pack. The LK35 and the M75 packs are almost identical, and discussions on various forums have shown that suppliers themselves do not appear to realise the distinctions between the two packs. Reading through discussions it has become apparent that LK35s have been sold as M75s, and vice versa. Pictures listed with a supply of LK35s can be M75s, and more worryingly many M75s listed with accurate M75 pictures are turning out to be LK35s. It appears the only way to mitigate this mis-identification will be to visit a surplus store in person and sort through the stock. The pack below is an LK35… …and this pack is an M75… …and this pack is sold as an LK35, and yet it is an M75… It is relevant to note that the soft part of the pack and the shoulder straps are discarded. They are NOT part of the CE TK back pack, and NONE of the webbing or buckles are used in the build (evidence to support this will be discussed in greater detail in subsequent build sections associated with the Alice pack and the canvas roll). The photographs below show a comparison between the LK35 and M75 frames… …and show the key diagnostic features to determine the LK35 from the M75: · The height of the frame posts at the top of the frame to which the soft part attaches; o ~45 mm on the LK35; o ~28 mm on the M75; and · The shape and colour of the frame post end caps; o Linear and green on the LK35; o Slight inverted cone shape and light grey on the M75 - Note that there are apparent colour variations and some correct shaped end caps have been supplied in black, not the light grey; · The shape, angle and welding points of the webbing attach mounting at the bend of the frame’s ‘shelf’; o Nearly perpendicular to the frame back and shelf on the LK35, and welded to outside of the frame; o More acutely angled in relation to the frame back on the M75, and welded in-line with the frame; · Slightly larger / deeper shelf on the M75 compared to the LK35; o The LK35 shelf depth is ~90 mm; and o The M75 shelf depth is ~105-110 mm. These details are important, as analysis of reference photography for the CE back pack, primarily associated with the posts and end caps and the webbing attachment mount, has allowed identification of the frame type used on the prop. The details seem to indicate that the correct pack frame used on the CE back pack is the M75, NOT the LK35. The M75 ‘feels’ slightly more robust and bulky than the taller LK35 – although this is purely a subjective feeling. This said, do note that certain M75s have been received with the correct shaped end caps but in black, not the light grey seen on the CE prop. The picture below shows the post end cap is grey, not the green seen on the LK35. Also, the frame section tubes are ~14 mm diameter, and the height of the post, from the horizontal top bar of the frame, is approximately twice that measurement i.e. close to the 28 mm of the M75 frame. Certainly not the 45 mm of the LK35. We also know that the webbing on the canvas roll is 1” / 25 mm width webbing (this will be examined in greater detail in the canvas roll build section). The distance from the top horizontal bar on the frame is nearly exactly the same height as the webbing width (on the canvas roll). This means that there is little more than 1" / ~25mm left on the frame upright from the upper horizontal bar to the end of the post and top of the end cap = ~28 mm = M75. If the frame was an LK35, then the top of the post (from the top horizontal bar) would be closer to 2 x width of the webbing (on the canvas roll). This appears to validate the hypothesis that the frame is the M75. The picture below shows that the weld spot for the webbing attachment mount does not extend all the way across the frame outside as is evident on the LK35. Rather, it is aligned with the frame and is barely discernible. It is important to note that the condition of field-issued and unissued frames is highly variable, and on-line pictures show large range of dings, scratches, bangs, chips etc. These are evident on the CE frame (see picture below) and the frame was not repainted for use on the prop. The webbing back supports (that are tied under tension horizontally across the frame in two places) are not dyed black. They are left untouched and original colour – well certainly there is photographic evidence that the lower back support webbing was left as per original frame. The team does acknowledge that the evidence base to support the identification of the M75 is not over-whelming from analysis of the reference material alone. However, we believe comparison of the two frame types side-by-side supports our identification of the M75 as the pack frame used on the CE prop. The frame appears to be available widely from army surplus stores and online shops across the UK, Europe and in the United States. However, it seem to be a gamble to whether you receive an LK35 or M75, even if the pictures on the site indicate one or the other. Colemans cites LK35 on its website, but the picture is an M75, and received kit appears to be either the LK35 OR the M75: https://colemans.com/shop/pouches-bags/swedish-military-backpack-with-frame/ LK35s can be bought cheaply in the UK from Military Mart: http://www.militarymart.co.uk/swedish-army-lk35-rucksack.html More links will be added when sourced but a suitable online search should turn up the pack. If 100% CE prop accuracy is not a concern, and as the differences between the two frames is minimal, then there is an easy mod that can be done to the LK35 to bring it much closer to the M75. The end caps can be removed, and the posts cut down, using an angle grinder or Dremel-type tool, to 28 mm. The end caps can be painted a light grey and then replaced. It is possible that a plastic or rubber end cap with the correct inverted slight cone shape, and the correct M75 colour, could be purchased on-line, although the team has not investigated this possibility. The next instalment of the build thread will be: 2. Soft pack – the Alice Pack. ireachy

A slightly contentious point as the TK in one shot wears the TD and yet the one at CE did not have the TD on the belt. The new TD mount was present, but the TD was absent. I think we will have to wait until the film is released to see if the shot in our thread with the TD on makes it to final cut. Will always go with screen accurate. This is the same issue as the pack strap over or under the pauldron. The CE was over, but most trailer and sizzle reel TKs are under pauldron, and yet that shot in our thread shows both over and under in same frame. Will see if that makes the final cut. I thought the CE strap over the pauldron was just a set dresser mistake for CE, but that may not be the case.

TK3645 - try Epic Militaria in the UK. PM or call them and ask for them - may be cheaper to get a pack with them on. Explain your circumstance - they are in the know and generally sympathetic.

Hi, got waylaid by everyday 'life things' this weekend. The Frame section will go up this week.

mr paul's version 2.0 pack WiP - antenna not yet attached properly. We're getting there...

Introduction This thread will look at the Rogue One Stormtrooper (R1 TK) back pack as seen on display at Celebration Europe 2016 (CE) in London. It is recognised that at least 3-4 R1 TKs have been seen wearing the back pack in the trailers, CE sizzle reel, and various promotional material. This build is concerned ONLY with the CE R1 TK pack, as this is the most documented and readily scrutinisable prop; due the vast online reference library generated by attendees at the convention. It is possible that there are variations in the builds of other packs used on screen in the final theatrical cut of Rogue One. We will also mention obvious variations in wearing the pack such as: placement of the pauldron over or under the right shoulder strap, and inclusion or omission of the detonator cylinder. This build is NOT associated with the R1 TK ‘hard’ back pack – the ‘Jedha Stormtrooper patrol’ pack – available from Hot Toys… …and glimpsed in the CE sizzle reel. The investigation behind the thread has been on-going since the pack was first seen in July 2016 at CE, with an increased focus over the last few weeks. The research is primarily a collaboration between four individuals: Paul Prentice (mr paul), Chris Trevas (lonepigeon) of ‘Parts of Star Wars’ (PoSW), Jody Williams (ht7), and myself Ian Reach (ireachy). Other notable contributions regarding certain parts have come from Andy Rodgers of ‘The Shed of Glittering Delights!’ (SoGD) Facebook group, and also the initial thread started by TK Gino here on ‘1st Imperial Stormtrooper Detachment’ (FISD). As well as significant time and effort researching the pack and its components, the team has also purchased found part components, along with numerous samples of ‘close to’ parts and sub-components, in efforts to build the most accurate / authentic pack possible. Many a 'blind alley' has been explored, with a discard pile of ‘not quite correct’ parts steadily building over the last couple of weeks. The build is based Mr Paul’s version 2.0 pack, as he and ireachy broke-down his version 1.0 pack based on the team’s detailed observations. The thread is intended to share the knowledge developed by the team, help others avoid mistakes we have made, and to act as a guide to building the most authentic R1 TK back pack possible. Of course, you can take as much detail, or as little, from this thread as you wish to inform your own builds, but we hope to present a compelling break-down and guide to building the prop. Most of the found parts are still readily available, and certain ‘hard to find’ parts will be available for sale from the team members as we proceed with the thread (it is possible that the team have found original suppliers of certain parts to Lucasfilm Ltd (LFL), although 100% corroboration is difficult to ascertain). This said, it should be noted that three of the four team members live in the UK where the supply of parts may be easier to source directly, than in other parts of the World. The build thread will be broken down into distinct sections, focusing on a discrete component, or sub-assembly, of the pack: 1. Frame; 2. Soft pack – the Alice Pack; 3. Ammo box; 4. Canvas roll; 5. Antenna; and 6. Shoulder straps, including the RAF K-Type dinghy quick release greeblie. Each section will be supported by references and evidence, and we will clearly indicate where we feel the evidence is weak and the team has extrapolated our own ideas and interpretations. There are a few limited cases of these extrapolations which could result in deviations from the actual CE R1 TK back prop. Most however are associated with the area of the pack that lies between the TK back and the back of the frame, ammo box and soft pack i.e. parts not seen in reference material, but also hidden from general view on the final pack as worn. The separate sections will describe details about the found parts, where known, and these will also be confirmed / published on the PoSW page as we progress. It will provide in-depth assembly observations, as there are significant specific details that have come to light, and will also cover dyeing methods and weathering techniques. As a teaser, here are some details that have come to light which we will be discussing, and have incorporated to the build: The build thread will start very soon with: 1. The Frame. ireachy

Hi Darthikari, It was definitely black at Celebration Europe. With some weathering splashes in an earth-tone.

Has anyone noticed that the inside of the ammo box appears to have a cloth insert laid over the inside of the box, below the grenade 'cups'? The grenade 'cup' section can be pulled out. Looking at Chris' hi res image the wrinkled / crumpled texture to the inside is very noticeable, and clearly different to the actual inside of the box.

Hi, just wondering if anyone has discussed the 'new' attachment method for the bicep to shoulder bell armour used on the new stormtrooper armour? Couldn't find anything in the various threads. I took this pics at Celebration Europe, and noted that there is a new attachment method, compared to the established OT rig. I hope that these pics are helpful to the forum. I have many others - currently posted on the RPF, but i can link these here if they are helpful? Best, Reachy