Jump to content

Darth_Nickel

Member
  • Posts

    382
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Darth_Nickel

  1. My 2 cents. Plastic looks much better, and frankly this is about looks. The majority of the EIB requirements are about looks, so this was a natural evolution. Sure there are other materials that are white that can cover the gap, but in my oppinion the intent was to make it look like the armor and improve the overall look of the armor.

     

    That said - I vote for plastic and all EIB be required to update. I voted for 12 month to allow more than enough time to complete the upgrade.

  2. I'm 6'3" and use the FX thighs. I want to try the RT thighs. From some pics, it looks like they may actually be a bit bigger.

     

    I've also got a little project that I'm SLOWLY working on. I am extending a spare set of thighs. If it works out, I'd be happy to do it again for someone else. It would remove the need for any shim, make them longer for less black, and perhaps even a little more better shape than the standard FX thigh. I don’t know…

     

    It does require a paint job, so either you would have to paint your armor to match or live with possible multiple shades of white.

  3. Pete,

     

    I love that you sand and round off the corners to make your tabs look neat. How Adrian Monk of you! :D

     

    Is there a reason you'd have to actually mount the snap to the plastic tabs with the hole and backing versus just CA gluing it on? I've CA glued the male ends of snaps onto ABS before with no problems. However, I can see how -- between the snap actually being mounted on the tab and the tab being welded with the ABS glue to the armor piece -- this would be well-nigh impossible to remove.

     

    -Chris

     

    The problems I've had with CA is that over time it seems that the stress of the joint will break the glue loose. I've not had good luck with a metal to plastic bond using CA. It can hold, but the strength is not great, and I've had the metal parts pull away in time. Now a snap that is attached to the actual plastic and a CA bond to plastic on plastic.. it's like a ROCK.

     

    When attaching a snap through plastic, be sure you have a "rod" long enough to clear the plastic. This will be sure that the snap connection is good as well, so you don't have a case of popping the female or male connector off the back on the snap. Remember that Plastic on plastic bond for CA is like a ROCK... it's not a fun fix.

  4. Thanks bud. I just attached the snaps to the holster tonight... it's so awesome not to have the slots that you put the belt through anymore :D. I'm debating if I want to use snaps on the front, or just do velcro. At the very least, since I can't sew it by my troop this weekend, I'll use sticky velcro on the fabric and the ab plate/back plate to make it stay for the troop.

     

    I'd think it would stay on the cloth long enough for the troop at least... if not, maybe use rivets to hold the velcro in since I can't sew...

     

    Hey, it's something!

     

    Be sure that you add rivets for the holster. They don't have snaps on them. The holster is actually riveted to the belt where the straps are on the inside of the belt. For elite status, you need to have the holster riveted to the inside of the belt with 4 rivets (2 on each side) and use the brown strips of leather for the straps.

  5. Darryl - Here is how my belt attaches to my ab. There are 3 snaps on the hard front of the belt. Then I have a small piece of Velcro that is sewn into the front that matches up to the center of the ab. Then once the belt is tight, it stays in place. The hard part about the removable belt is you need to make sure you are centered when you put it on. The Velcro in the front serves well on the duel purposes.

     

    2r7jhXx.jpg

     

    gdlKWeN.jpg

     

    YraTdVU.jpg

  6. There is a guy on theBay that has sold 3 or 4 of the eFX's for $400. Isn't that about the smae price as the TE2?

     

    No, it's not the same price as a TE2.

     

    The eFX is more for a collector, and I would not recommend trooping in it at all. I've got the MR LE (which is the same as the eFX LE). It's heavy (fiberglass) and tight (with all the padding). It looks great on a shelf, but you would be much happier with a different bucket when trooping. I "think" you would be happier if you got Ooe that would be lighter, one that you can add fans to, one that you could add a voice changer to, etc...

  7. Noel is right. No one has the skills until they do it.... I'm here to help ya too DJ. You are not too far away from me :) It's really not too difficult, but it does take time. So if number 1 is the main factor, then well.... ya know.

     

    But with time, you will find yourself with a nice result.

  8. Wow that looks great...has anyone identified what kind of FX this was??? The top of the head is definitely FX but the vocoder as part of the mold...maybe a cast of an MR or Rubies for the face plate?

     

    Thanks guys for the compliments. It means a lot.

     

    It looked like it was an older helmet. The plastic was really yellow under there.... check out some of those pics above. I think that rules out any MR question. The vocoder really lacked definition. I added a sculpting resin (magic sculp), cut the groves/lines again and added the second little ridge toward the neck as well.

     

     

    Paul - I agree. I don't like the look of the FX. It's just...well... wrong. I DO like the overall size for bigger people, but the FX just doesn't cut it. I've tried to correct some of the points that really get under my skin, but it's still FX....

     

    I do like how the ridge came out on the back. That helped a bit.

×
×
  • Create New...