Jump to content

equuspolo

Imperial Attaché[TK]
  • Posts

    648
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3

Posts posted by equuspolo

  1. 1 hour ago, TheRascalKing said:

    Before I vote, I'd appreciate clarification. This statement:

     

     

    Seems to me to be at odds with this statement:

     

     

    I recently noted from the reference shared over here posted by Heritage Auctions:

     

    lf (12).jpg

     

    That not all blasters used on screen for FOTKs had a folding stock or lights, and we can clearly see that this handle is not movable.

     

    Can I submit a blaster for L3 approval and CRL amendment using the clear reference above?

     

    Or if we're still going to claim only Hero blasters have validity in CRL consideration, what's the point of this?

     

    That’s a great point Justin.  These are stunt blasters 

  2. So I’ve stayed away from FISD for a bit because of the frustrating discussion regarding the blaster.  And heavy weapons trooper.  That’s why I have not taken the last three submissions to centurion and may not submit anymore.  Perhaps maybe when I build a rogue one kit.  I have over 150 detailed photos that I can’t release yet because it had my name in them.  Soon I will.  But even then I guarantee you if I submitted crl photos from set, which I took.  Who has that? It would get subjected to the absolute subjective not supported but subjective decision which I have to admit plagues this process.  
     

    so here it is.  Randomly came across this and totally forgot about it.  
     

    The Last Jedi blaster

     

    S30Qy2j.jpeg

     

    this screams issue is over.  
     

    same as the heavy weapons trooper that I was told got rejected due to jealousy and I have no idea why and from whom.  Absolutely ridiculous.  
     

    So when I finally decide to build a rogue one kit.  Let’s see what happens.  
     

    So I hope this once and for all resolves this ridiculous blaster issue.  But I won’t let up on it and will not advise anyone to follow that ridiculous standard.  If someone builds that blaster I get it.  Absolutely but to exclude it.  Stupid absolutely stupid.  Then make the crl have two blasters.  
     

    Regarding HWT it’s all there and I get asked about it all the time and people are converting after approvals.  So what’s the point.  

  3. Well after hundreds of questions, I finally made a video to help explain how I built this first order armor.  It’s an hour and twenty five minites long.  Some of the information is for new potential builder.  So everyone can fast forward to whatever pertains to them.  So this is the build for The Last Jedi and The Rise of Skywalker variation.  However it will touch a bit on The Force Awakens variation as well.  This is the new Denuo Novo First Order Stormtrooper armor and helmets.

     

    there are a lot of exceptional builders here and build threads.  This is not to override any of them, but rather a video aid to them. 

     

     

    • Like 6
  4. Hey Mario so question for you because I need clarification.  
     

    I recall having screws on the rail before and asked to remove it.  So screws or no screws?

     

    Second, rail, is it half way or slightly more forward because it’s all over the place. 

     

    also I never noticed the lines on the site as I replaced the site to put the light on.  The previous did not have it.  So thank you for pointing it out and it will be corrected. 
     

    Finally I will be supplying my blaster with different ring options.  This conversation beat me down and I will supply the white and white but I will not be changing it to the round rear site.  I can but I wont.  Irs a blatant disregard of the existing photos of blasters. 
     

    Mario… thank you for your help.  Regarding the TFA I’ll upload the rail less pic.  Thank you for everything 

  5. 2 hours ago, Sly11 said:

    Love the photos Ardeshir, no bad path here, only the fact that we asked for your patience sir. There is a lot going on in the background for election preparation which currently is a priority over CRL work.

    We have a process that allows our members to participate in the shaping of our CRL's, why should that be circumvented?, how is it a bad path for our members to be involved?

    Appreciate it beyond words and always patience and absolutely understand with elections coming up.  Just wanted to make sure everything is as it needs to be

×
×
  • Create New...