Jump to content

Colin1138

501st Stormtrooper[TK]
  • Posts

    243
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Colin1138

  1. A split CRL would be cool!

    The Deathstar variant would be the easist to nail down for a split out CRL. All those guys were pristine, had white soles,bubble lenses,TDs and holsters.
    The Endor version has so many variables. All of the above mentioned re: TDs etc but also flat lenses/bubbles, some were weathered, some not. Some even liked to wear their chestplates under the ab plate...if we really wanted to be thorough!

    Sent from my SM-J320FN using Tapatalk

    • Like 1
  2. These are fair and valid points indeed. But it somewhat highlights the issue of the holster. The majority of troopers did wear them, both on DS2 and Endor, yet its listed as optional on the CRL(or was at least when I built my kit..and got EIB with it)
    .If we view it in a similar scenario to the TD..then should we bump it up to required now?

    Sent from my SM-J320FN using Tapatalk

  3. I always thought going without a detonator should have been an option. Similar to how packless sandies are allowed. There were a good number of them and liklihood is that they were ommitted for the stuntmens safety/comfort. Also the fact holsters are viewed as optional for ROTJs makes a compelling case for dets also being optional.
    But I totally get the strive for uniformity.

    Sent from my SM-J320FN using Tapatalk

  4. The attitude from him is appalling! Wholly seperate from the recasting, his behaviour is more than enough for me to never want to deal with him. Or suggest his wares to others.

    IMO the quality of the product is only part of the reason to choose a particular vendor. Their customer service, friendliness, business ethic and how they carry themselves are all just as important to me as a customer.
    This guy is striking out hard.

    Sent from my SM-J320FN using Tapatalk

    • Like 2
  5. It's heartening to see so many other vendors popping in here and elsewhere with words of support and encouragement. It shows a real sense of community.

    A shame then at the direction the thread on the main forum seems to be taking. Last time I looked there were a couple posts that dismissed the issue and almost defended TMs actions.

    I guess personal friendships can and will get in the way of morals and ethics...

    Sent from my SM-J320FN using Tapatalk

    • Like 3



  6.  
    The blaster appears to be the ESB style blaster. No chargers or counters.
     
    cc1163211e.jpg&key=ea9ecbb6f86aca44641c785037385debf6647fcfa586082eb86d6f5858189293
    564aa228c1.jpg&key=1d7f1fa24267805d1febbf6af2193f6fe5a181e659e19a3b633dc546e04ea0df
     



    Thats a ROTJ blaster. Though strangely upscaled!

    The lid is a bit of a hybrid. ROTJ lenses and screwless ears, but pretty much ANH everything else.

    These guys are a real curiosity! Shsme I didn't pay too much attention whilst slicing and dicing.
    Good luck with the build!

    Sent from my SM-J320FN using Tapatalk

    • Like 1
  7. Just thinking out loud here...but would there be enough grounds to split the ROTJ CRL into two versions? Along similar lines to the ANH-S and ANH-H? The guys on the Deathstar,and the Landing pad had a good number of differences to the Grunts on Endor(lets call them 'stunts'?)

    For example- DS guys were all shiny clean, bubble lenses, all holsters,all Thermal Dets; Endor guys were weathered, had flat lenses and a lot of them (too many IMO to be accidental omissions) had missing holsters,missing Dets, or were missing both.

    Sent from my SM-J320FN using Tapatalk

  8. Great to see another ROTJ!!
    Although I'd usually advocate studying the CRL for new builders, in this case I'd recommend not doing so for the reasons already mentioned. I built mine years ago..and even back then the CRL was wonky. Best bet is to do as suggested and follow any recent EIB/Cent threads for advice.

    Sent from my SM-J320FN using Tapatalk

    • Like 1
×
×
  • Create New...